Maxim Perry

My feedback

  1. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  DisplayLink Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Maxim Perry supported this idea  · 
  2. 632 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    148 comments  ·  DisplayLink Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Maxim Perry supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Maxim Perry commented  · 

    Yet a year later, now at v1.7.1, still no 2560x1440 retina HiDPI (4k). I do agree with other comments in this section: 1440 is a standard now. Native resolution looks tiny, and 1920x1080 HiDPI looks huge and prevents the purpose of getting 4k monitors to being with: getting more on the screen.

    I have spent countless hours trying to make it work with other software such as RDM, BetterDisplay, etc... when really, it should be a feature. It's almost a bug for not being there by now.

    We're not asking for HDR or for 8K @ 60Hz here; we're just looking for a simple resolution scale!

Feedback and Knowledge Base